The PHREG Procedure
- Overview
-
Getting Started
-
SyntaxPROC PHREG StatementASSESS StatementBASELINE StatementBAYES StatementBY StatementCLASS StatementCONTRAST StatementEFFECT StatementESTIMATE StatementFREQ StatementHAZARDRATIO StatementID StatementLSMEANS StatementLSMESTIMATE StatementMODEL StatementOUTPUT StatementProgramming StatementsRANDOM StatementSTRATA StatementSLICE StatementSTORE StatementTEST StatementWEIGHT Statement
-
DetailsFailure Time DistributionTime and CLASS Variables UsagePartial Likelihood Function for the Cox ModelCounting Process Style of InputLeft-Truncation of Failure TimesThe Multiplicative Hazards ModelProportional Rates/Means Models for Recurrent EventsThe Frailty ModelProportional Subdistribution Hazards Model for Competing-Risks DataHazard RatiosNewton-Raphson MethodFirth’s Modification for Maximum Likelihood EstimationRobust Sandwich Variance EstimateTesting the Global Null HypothesisType 3 Tests and Joint TestsConfidence Limits for a Hazard RatioUsing the TEST Statement to Test Linear HypothesesAnalysis of Multivariate Failure Time DataModel Fit StatisticsSchemper-Henderson Predictive MeasureResidualsDiagnostics Based on Weighted ResidualsInfluence of Observations on Overall Fit of the ModelSurvivor Function EstimatorsCaution about Using Survival Data with Left TruncationEffect Selection MethodsAssessment of the Proportional Hazards ModelThe Penalized Partial Likelihood Approach for Fitting Frailty ModelsSpecifics for Bayesian AnalysisComputational ResourcesInput and Output Data SetsDisplayed OutputODS Table NamesODS Graphics
-
ExamplesStepwise RegressionBest Subset SelectionModeling with Categorical PredictorsFirth’s Correction for Monotone LikelihoodConditional Logistic Regression for m:n MatchingModel Using Time-Dependent Explanatory VariablesTime-Dependent Repeated Measurements of a CovariateSurvival CurvesAnalysis of ResidualsAnalysis of Recurrent Events DataAnalysis of Clustered DataModel Assessment Using Cumulative Sums of Martingale ResidualsBayesian Analysis of the Cox ModelBayesian Analysis of Piecewise Exponential ModelAnalysis of Competing-Risks Data
- References
Overview: PHREG Procedure
The analysis of survival data requires special techniques because the data are almost always incomplete and familiar parametric assumptions might be unjustifiable. Investigators follow subjects until they reach a prespecified endpoint (for example, death). However, subjects sometimes withdraw from a study, or the study is completed before the endpoint is reached. In these cases, the survival times (also known as failure times) are censored; subjects survived to a certain time beyond which their status is unknown. The uncensored survival times are sometimes referred to as event times. Methods of survival analysis must account for both censored and uncensored data.
Many types of models have been used for survival data. Two of the more popular types of models are the accelerated failure time model (Kalbfleisch and Prentice 1980) and the Cox proportional hazards model (Cox 1972). Each has its own assumptions about the underlying distribution of the survival times. Two closely related functions often used to describe the distribution of survival times are the survivor function and the hazard function. See the section Failure Time Distribution for definitions. The accelerated failure time model assumes a parametric form for the effects of the explanatory variables and usually assumes a parametric form for the underlying survivor function. The Cox proportional hazards model also assumes a parametric form for the effects of the explanatory variables, but it allows an unspecified form for the underlying survivor function.
The PHREG procedure performs regression analysis of survival data based on the Cox proportional hazards model. Cox’s semiparametric model is widely used in the analysis of survival data to explain the effect of explanatory variables on hazard rates.
The survival time of each member of a population is assumed to follow its own hazard function, 
, expressed as
![\[ \lambda _{i}(t)=\lambda (t;{\bZ }_{i}) = {\lambda _0}(t) \ \mr{exp}({\bZ }’_{i}\bbeta ) \]](images/statug_phreg0002.png)
where 
is an arbitrary and unspecified baseline hazard function, 
is the vector of explanatory variables for the ith individual, and 
is the vector of unknown regression parameters that is associated with the explanatory variables. The vector is assumed to be the same for all individuals. The survivor function can be expressed as
![\[ S(t;{\bZ }_{i}) = [S_{0}(t)]^{ \ \mr{exp}({\bZ }'_{i}\bbeta )} \]](images/statug_phreg0006.png)
where 
is the baseline survivor function.
To estimate , Cox (1972, 1975) introduced the partial likelihood function, which eliminates the unknown baseline hazard and accounts for censored survival times.
The partial likelihood of Cox also allows time-dependent explanatory variables. An explanatory variable is time-dependent if its value for any given individual can change over time. Time-dependent variables have many useful applications in survival analysis. You can use a time-dependent variable to model the effect of subjects changing treatment groups. Or you can include time-dependent variables such as blood pressure or blood chemistry measures that vary with time during the course of a study. You can also use time-dependent variables to test the validity of the proportional hazards model.
An alternative way to fit models with time-dependent explanatory variables is to use the counting process style of input. The counting process formulation enables PROC PHREG to fit a superset of the Cox model, known as the multiplicative hazards model. This extension also includes recurrent events data and left-truncation of failure times. The theory of these models is based on the counting process pioneered by Andersen and Gill (1982), and the model is often referred to as the Andersen-Gill model.
Multivariate failure-time data arise when each study subject can potentially experience several events (for example, multiple infections after surgery) or when there exists some natural or artificial clustering of subjects (for example, a litter of mice) that induces dependence among the failure times of the same cluster. Data in the former situation are referred to as multiple events data, which include recurrent events data as a special case; data in the latter situation are referred to as clustered data. You can use PROC PHREG to carry out various methods of analyzing these data.
The population under study can consist of a number of subpopulations, each of which has its own baseline hazard function. PROC PHREG performs a stratified analysis to adjust for such subpopulation differences. Under the stratified model, the hazard function for the jth individual in the ith stratum is expressed as
![\[ \lambda _{ij}(t)=\lambda _{i0}(t) \ \mr{exp}({\bZ }’_{ij}\bbeta ) \]](images/statug_phreg0008.png)
where 
is the baseline hazard function for the ith stratum and 
is the vector of explanatory variables for the individual. The regression coefficients are assumed to be the same for all
individuals across all strata.
Ties in the failure times can arise when the time scale is genuinely discrete or when survival times that are generated from the continuous-time model are grouped into coarser units. The PHREG procedure includes four methods of handling ties. The discrete logistic model is available for discrete time-scale data. The other three methods apply to continuous time-scale data. The exact method computes the exact conditional probability under the model that the set of observed tied event times occurs before all the censored times with the same value or before larger values. Breslow and Efron methods provide approximations to the exact method.
Variable selection is a typical exploratory exercise in multiple regression when the investigator is interested in identifying important prognostic factors from a large number of candidate variables. The PHREG procedure provides four selection methods: forward selection, backward elimination, stepwise selection, and best subset selection. The best subset selection method is based on the likelihood score statistic. This method identifies a specified number of best models that contain one, two, or three variables and so on, up to the single model that contains all of the explanatory variables.
The PHREG procedure also enables you to do the following: include an offset variable in the model; weight the observations in the input data; test linear hypotheses about the regression parameters; perform conditional logistic regression analysis for matched case-control studies; output survivor function estimates, residuals, and regression diagnostics; and estimate and plot the survivor function for a new set of covariates.
PROC PHREG can also be used to fit the multinomial logit choice model to discrete choice data. See http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/tnote/tnote_marketresearch.html for more information about discrete choice modeling and the multinomial logit model. Look for the "Discrete Choice" report.
The PHREG procedure uses ODS Graphics to create graphs as part of its output. For example, the ASSESS statement uses a graphical method that uses ODS Graphics to check the adequacy of the model. For general information about ODS Graphics, see Chapter 21: Statistical Graphics Using ODS.
For both the BASELINE and OUTPUT statements, the default method of estimating a survivor function has changed to the Breslow (1972) estimator—that is, METHOD=CH. The option NOMEAN that was available in the BASELINE statement prior to SAS/STAT 9.2 has become obsolete—that is, requested statistics at the sample average values of the covariates are no longer computed and added to the OUT= data set. However, if the COVARIATES= data set is not specified, the requested statistics are computed and output for the covariate set that consists of the reference levels for the CLASS variables and sample averages for the continuous variable. In addition to the requested statistics, the OUT= data set also contains all variables in the COVARIATES= data set.
The remaining sections of this chapter contain information about how to use PROC PHREG, information about the underlying statistical methodology, and some sample applications of the procedure. The section Getting Started: PHREG Procedure introduces PROC PHREG with two examples. The section Syntax: PHREG Procedure describes the syntax of the procedure. The section Details: PHREG Procedure summarizes the statistical techniques used in PROC PHREG. The section Examples: PHREG Procedure includes eight additional examples of useful applications. Experienced SAS/STAT software users might decide to proceed to the "Syntax" section, while other users might choose to read both the "Getting Started" and "Examples" sections before proceeding to "Syntax" and "Details."