The LOGISTIC procedure is similar in use to the other regression procedures in the SAS System. To demonstrate the similarity,
suppose the response variable y
is binary or ordinal, and x1
and x2
are two explanatory variables of interest. To fit a logistic regression model, you can specify a MODEL statement similar
to that used in the REG procedure. For example:
proc logistic; model y=x1 x2; run;
The response variable y
can be either character or numeric. PROC LOGISTIC enumerates the total number of response categories and orders the response
levels according to the response variable option ORDER=
in the MODEL
statement.
You can also input binary response data that are grouped. In the following statements, n
represents the number of trials and r
represents the number of events:
proc logistic; model r/n=x1 x2; run;
The following example illustrates the use of PROC LOGISTIC. The data, taken from Cox and Snell (1989, pp. 10–11), consist of the number, r
, of ingots not ready for rolling, out of n
tested, for a number of combinations of heating time and soaking time.
data ingots; input Heat Soak r n @@; datalines; 7 1.0 0 10 14 1.0 0 31 27 1.0 1 56 51 1.0 3 13 7 1.7 0 17 14 1.7 0 43 27 1.7 4 44 51 1.7 0 1 7 2.2 0 7 14 2.2 2 33 27 2.2 0 21 51 2.2 0 1 7 2.8 0 12 14 2.8 0 31 27 2.8 1 22 51 4.0 0 1 7 4.0 0 9 14 4.0 0 19 27 4.0 1 16 ;
The following invocation of PROC LOGISTIC fits the binary logit model to the grouped data. The continuous covariates Heat
and Soak
are specified as predictors, and the bar notation ("|") includes their interaction, Heat
*Soak
. The ODDSRATIO
statement produces odds ratios in the presence of interactions, and a graphical display of the requested odds ratios is produced
when ODS Graphics is enabled.
ods graphics on; proc logistic data=ingots; model r/n = Heat | Soak; oddsratio Heat / at(Soak=1 2 3 4); run;
The results of this analysis are shown in the following figures. PROC LOGISTIC first lists background information in Figure 72.1 about the fitting of the model. Included are the name of the input data set, the response variable(s) used, the number of observations used, and the link function used.
Figure 72.1: Binary Logit Model
The "Response Profile" table (Figure 72.2) lists the response categories (which are Event and Nonevent when grouped data are input), their ordered values, and their total frequencies for the given data.
Figure 72.2: Response Profile with Events/Trials Syntax
The "Model Fit Statistics" table (Figure 72.3) contains Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), the Schwarz criterion (SC), and the negative of twice the log likelihood
(–2 Log L) for the intercept-only model and the fitted model. AIC and SC can be used to compare different models, and the
ones with smaller values are preferred. Results of the likelihood ratio test and the efficient score test for testing the
joint significance of the explanatory variables (Soak
, Heat
, and their interaction) are included in the "Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0" table (Figure 72.3); the small p-values reject the hypothesis that all slope parameters are equal to zero.
Figure 72.3: Fit Statistics and Hypothesis Tests
The "Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates" table in Figure 72.4 lists the parameter estimates, their standard errors, and the results of the Wald test for individual parameters. Note that
the Heat*Soak
parameter is not significantly different from zero (p=0.727), nor is the Soak
variable (p=0.6916).
Figure 72.4: Parameter Estimates
The "Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses" table (Figure 72.5) contains four measures of association for assessing the predictive ability of a model. They are based on the number of pairs of observations with different response values, the number of concordant pairs, and the number of discordant pairs, which are also displayed. Formulas for these statistics are given in the section Rank Correlation of Observed Responses and Predicted Probabilities.
Figure 72.5: Association Table
The ODDSRATIO
statement produces the "Odds Ratio Estimates and Wald Confidence Intervals" table (Figure 72.6), and a graphical display of these estimates is shown in Figure 72.7. The differences between the odds ratios are small compared to the variability shown by their confidence intervals, which
confirms the previous conclusion that the Heat
*Soak
parameter is not significantly different from zero.
Figure 72.6: Odds Ratios of Heat at Several Values of Soak
Figure 72.7: Plot of Odds Ratios of Heat at Several Values of Soak
Because the Heat
*Soak
interaction is nonsignificant, the following statements fit a main-effects model:
proc logistic data=ingots; model r/n = Heat Soak; run;
The results of this analysis are shown in the following figures. The model information and response profiles are the same as those in Figure 72.1 and Figure 72.2 for the saturated model. The "Model Fit Statistics" table in Figure 72.8 shows that the AIC and SC for the main-effects model are smaller than for the saturated model, indicating that the main-effects model might be the preferred model. As in the preceding model, the "Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0" table indicates that the parameters are significantly different from zero.
Figure 72.8: Fit Statistics and Hypothesis Tests
The "Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates" table in Figure 72.9 again shows that the Soak
parameter is not significantly different from zero (p=0.8639). The odds ratio for each effect parameter, estimated by exponentiating the corresponding parameter estimate, is shown
in the "Odds Ratios Estimates" table (Figure 72.9), along with 95% Wald confidence intervals. The confidence interval for the Soak
parameter contains the value 1, which also indicates that this effect is not significant.
Figure 72.9: Parameter Estimates and Odds Ratios
Using these parameter estimates, you can calculate the estimated logit of as
For example, if Heat
=7 and Soak
=1, then logit. Using this logit estimate, you can calculate as follows:
This gives the predicted probability of the event (ingot not ready for rolling) for Heat
=7 and Soak
=1. Note that PROC LOGISTIC can calculate these statistics for you; use the OUTPUT
statement with the PREDICTED=
option, or use the SCORE
statement.
To illustrate the use of an alternative form of input data, the following program creates the ingots
data set with the new variables NotReady
and Freq
instead of n
and r
. The variable NotReady
represents the response of individual units; it has a value of 1 for units not ready for rolling (event) and a value of 0
for units ready for rolling (nonevent). The variable Freq
represents the frequency of occurrence of each combination of Heat
, Soak
, and NotReady
. Note that, compared to the previous data set, NotReady
=1 implies Freq
=r
, and NotReady
=0 implies Freq
=n
–r
.
data ingots; input Heat Soak NotReady Freq @@; datalines; 7 1.0 0 10 14 1.0 0 31 14 4.0 0 19 27 2.2 0 21 51 1.0 1 3 7 1.7 0 17 14 1.7 0 43 27 1.0 1 1 27 2.8 1 1 51 1.0 0 10 7 2.2 0 7 14 2.2 1 2 27 1.0 0 55 27 2.8 0 21 51 1.7 0 1 7 2.8 0 12 14 2.2 0 31 27 1.7 1 4 27 4.0 1 1 51 2.2 0 1 7 4.0 0 9 14 2.8 0 31 27 1.7 0 40 27 4.0 0 15 51 4.0 0 1 ;
The following statements invoke PROC LOGISTIC to fit the main-effects model by using the alternative form of the input data set:
proc logistic data=ingots; model NotReady(event='1') = Heat Soak; freq Freq; run;
Results of this analysis are the same as the preceding single-trial main-effects analysis. The displayed output for the two runs are identical except for the background information of the model fit and the "Response Profile" table shown in Figure 72.10.
Figure 72.10: Response Profile with Single-Trial Syntax
By default, Ordered Values are assigned to the sorted response values in ascending order, and PROC LOGISTIC models the probability
of the response level that corresponds to the Ordered Value 1. There are several methods to change these defaults; the preceding
statements specify the response variable option EVENT=
to model the probability of NotReady
=1 as displayed in Figure 72.10. For more information, see the section Response Level Ordering.