Previous Page | Next Page

The PHREG Procedure

Specifics for Bayesian Analysis

To request a Bayesian analysis, you specify the new BAYES statement in addition to the PROC PHREG statement and the MODEL statement. You include a CLASS statement if you have effects that involve categorical variables. The FREQ or WEIGHT statement can be included if you have a frequency or weight variable, respectively, in the input data. The STRATA statement can be used to carry out a stratified analysis for the Cox model, but it is not allowed in the piecewise constant baseline hazard model. Programming statements can be used to create time-dependent covariates for the Cox model, but they are not allowed in the piecewise constant baseline hazard model. However, you can use the counting process style of input to accommodate time-dependent covariates that are not continuously changing with time for the piecewise constant baseline hazard model and the Cox model as well. The HAZARDRATIO statement enables you to request a hazard ratio analysis based on the posterior samples. The ASSESS, CONTRAST, ID, OUTPUT, and TEST statements, if specified, are ignored. Also ignored are the COVM and COVS options in the PROC PHREG statement and the following options in the MODEL statement: BEST=, CORRB, COVB, DETAILS, HIERARCHY=, INCLUDE=, MAXSTEP=, NOFIT, PLCONV=, SELECTION=, SEQUENTIAL, SLENTRY=, and SLSTAY=.

Piecewise Constant Baseline Hazard Model

Single Failure Time Variable

Let be the observed data. Let be a partition of the time axis.

Hazards in Original Scale

The hazard function for subject is

     

where

     

The baseline cumulative hazard function is

     

where

     

The log likelihood is given by

     
     

where .

Note that for , the full conditional for is log-concave only when , but the full conditionals for the ’s are always log-concave.

For a given , gives

     

Substituting these values into gives the profile log likelihood for

     

where . Since the constant does not depend on , it can be discarded from in the optimization.

The MLE of is obtained by maximizing

     

with respect to , and the MLE of is given by

     

For , let

     
     

The partial derivatives of are

     
     

The asymptotic covariance matrix for is obtained as the inverse of the information matrix given by

     
     
     

See Example 6.5.1 in Lawless (2003) for details.

Hazards in Log Scale

By letting

     

you can build a prior correlation among the ’s by using a correlated prior , where .

The log likelihood is given by

     

Then the MLE of is given by

     

Note that the full conditionals for ’s and ’s are always log-concave.

The asymptotic covariance matrix for is obtained as the inverse of the information matrix formed by

     
     
     

Counting Process Style of Input

Let be the observed data. Let be a partition of the time axis, where for all .

Replacing with

     

the formulation for the single failure time variable applies.

Priors for Model Parameters

For a Cox model, the model parameters are the regression coefficients. For a piecewise exponential model, the model parameters consist of the regression coefficients and the hazards or log-hazards. The priors for the hazards and the priors for the regression coefficients are assumed to be independent, while you can have a joint multivariate normal prior for the log-hazards and the regression coefficients.

Hazard Parameters

Let be the constant baseline hazards.

Improper Prior

The joint prior density is given by

     

This prior is improper (nonintegrable), but the posterior distribution is proper as long as there is at least one event time in each of the constant hazard intervals.

Uniform Prior

The joint prior density is given by

     

This prior is improper (nonintegrable), but the posteriors are proper as long as there is at least one event time in each of the constant hazard intervals.

Gamma Prior

The gamma distribution has a pdf

     

where is the shape parameter and is the scale parameter. The mean is and the variance is .

Independent Gamma Prior

Suppose for , has an independent prior. The joint prior density is given by

     
AR1 Prior

are correlated as follows:

     
     
     
     

The joint prior density is given by

     

Log-Hazard Parameters

Write .

Uniform Prior

The joint prior density is given by

     

Note that the uniform prior for the log-hazards is the same as the improper prior for the hazards.

Normal Prior

Assume has a multivariate normal prior with mean vector and covariance matrix . The joint prior density is given by

     

Regression Coefficients

Let be the vector of regression coefficients.

Uniform Prior

The joint prior density is given by

     

This prior is improper, but the posterior distributions for are proper.

Normal Prior

Assume has a multivariate normal prior with mean vector and covariance matrix . The joint prior density is given by

     
Joint Multivariate Normal Prior for Log-Hazards and Regression Coefficients

Assume has a multivariate normal prior with mean vector and covariance matrix . The joint prior density is given by

     
Zellner’s g-Prior

Assume has a multivariate normal prior with mean vector and covariance matrix , where is the design matrix and is either a constant or it follows a gamma prior with density where and are the SHAPE= and ISCALE= parameters. Let be the rank of . The joint prior density with g being a constant c is given by

     

The joint prior density with g having a gamma prior is given by

     

Posterior Distribution

Denote the observed data by .

Cox Model

     

where is the partial likelihood function with regression coefficients as parameters.

Piecewise Exponential Model

Hazard Parameters
     

where is the likelihood function with hazards and regression coefficients as parameters.

Log-Hazard Parameters
     

where is the likelihood function with log-hazards and regression coefficients as parameters.

Sampling from the Posterior Distribution

For the Gibbs sampler, PROC PHREG uses the ARMS (adaptive rejection Metropolis sampling) algorithm of Gilks, Best, and Tan (1995) to sample from the full conditionals. This is the default sampling scheme. Alternatively, you can requests the random walk Metropolis (RWM) algorithm to sample an entire parameter vector from the posterior distribution. For a general discussion of these algorithms, refer to section Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method.

You can output these posterior samples into a SAS data set by using the OUTPOST= option in the BAYES statement, or you can use the following SAS statement to output the posterior samples into the SAS data set Post:

 ods output PosteriorSample=Post;

The output data set also includes the variables LogLike and LogPost, which represent the log of the likelihood and the log of the posterior log density, respectively.

Let be the parameter vector. For the Cox model, the ’s are the regression coefficients ’s, and for the piecewise constant baseline hazard model, the ’s consist of the baseline hazards ’s (or log baseline hazards ’s) and the regression coefficients ’s. Let be the likelihood function, where is the observed data. Note that for the Cox model, the likelihood contains the infinite-dimensional baseline hazard function, and the gamma process is perhaps the most commonly used prior process (Ibrahim, Chen, and Sinha; 2001). However, Sinha, Ibrahim, and Chen (2003) justify using the partial likelihood as the likelihood function for the Bayesian analysis. Let be the prior distribution. The posterior is proportional to the joint distribution .

Gibbs Sampler

The full conditional distribution of is proportional to the joint distribution; that is,

     

For example, the one-dimensional conditional distribution of , given , is computed as

     

Suppose you have a set of arbitrary starting values . Using the ARMS algorithm, an iteration of the Gibbs sampler consists of the following:

  • draw from

  • draw from

  • draw from

After one iteration, you have . After iterations, you have . Cumulatively, a chain of samples is obtained.

Random Walk Metropolis Algorithm

PROC PHREG uses a multivariate normal proposal distribution centered at . With an initial parameter vector , a new sample is obtained as follows:

  • sample from

  • calculate the quantity

  • sample from the uniform distribution

  • set if ; otherwise set

With taking the role of , the previous steps are repeated to generate the next sample . After iterations, a chain of samples is obtained.

Starting Values of the Markov Chains

When the BAYES statement is specified, PROC PHREG generates one Markov chain that contains the approximate posterior samples of the model parameters. Additional chains are produced when the Gelman-Rubin diagnostics are requested. Starting values (initial values) can be specified in the INITIAL= data set in the BAYES statement. If the INITIAL= option is not specified, PROC PHREG picks its own initial values for the chains based on the maximum likelihood estimates of and the prior information of .

Denote as the integral value of .

Constant Baseline Hazards ’s

For the first chain that the summary statistics and diagnostics are based on, the initial values are

     

For subsequent chains, the starting values are picked in two different ways according to the total number of chains specified. If the total number of chains specified is less than or equal to 10, initial values of the th chain () are given by

     

with the plus sign for odd and minus sign for even . If the total number of chains is greater than 10, initial values are picked at random over a wide range of values. Let be a uniform random number between 0 and 1; the initial value for is given by

     

Regression Coefficients and Log-Hazard Parameters ’s

The ’s are the regression coefficients ’s, and in the piecewise exponential model, include the log-hazard parameters ’s. For the first chain that the summary statistics and regression diagnostics are based on, the initial values are

     

If the number of chains requested is less than or equal to 10, initial values for the th chain () are given by

     

with the plus sign for odd and minus sign for even . When there are more than 10 chains, the initial value for the is picked at random over the range ; that is,

     

where is a uniform random number between 0 and 1.

Fit Statistics

Denote the observed data by . Let be the vector of parameters of length . Let be the likelihood. The deviance information criterion (DIC) proposed in Spiegelhalter et al. (2002) is a Bayesian model assessment tool. Let Dev. Let and be the corresponding posterior means of and , respectively. The deviance information criterion is computed as

     

Also computed is

     

where is interpreted as the effective number of parameters.

Note that defined here does not have the standardizing term as in the section Deviance Information Criterion (DIC). Nevertheless, the DIC calculated here is still useful for variable selection.

Posterior Distribution for Quantities of Interest

Let be the parameter vector. For the Cox model, the ’s are the regression coefficients ’s; for the piecewise constant baseline hazard model, the ’s consist of the baseline hazards ’s (or log baseline hazards ’s) and the regression coefficients ’s. Let be the chain that represents the posterior distribution for .

Consider a quantity of interest that can be expressed as a function of the parameter vector . You can construct the posterior distribution of by evaluating the function for each in . The posterior chain for is Summary statistics such as mean, standard deviation, percentiles, and credible intervals are used to describe the posterior distribution of .

Hazard Ratio

As shown in the section Hazard Ratios, a log-hazard ratio is a linear combination of the regression coefficients. Let be the vector of linear coefficients. The posterior sample for this hazard ratio is the set .

Survival Distribution

Let be a covariate vector of interest.

Cox Model

Let be the observed data. Define

     

Consider the th draw of . The baseline cumulative hazard function at time is given by

     

For the given covariate vector , the cumulative hazard function at time is

     

and the survival function at time is

     
Piecewise Exponential Model

Let be a partition of the time axis. Consider the th draw in , where consists of and . The baseline cumulative hazard function at time is

     

where

     

For the given covariate vector , the cumulative hazard function at time is

     

and the survival function at time is

     
Previous Page | Next Page | Top of Page