After an LP is solved, you might want to change a set of the parameters of the LP and solve the problem again. This can be done efficiently in PROC OPTMODEL. The warm start technique uses the optimal solution of the solved LP as a starting point and solves the modified LP problem faster than it can be solved again from scratch. This example illustrates reoptimizing the diet problem described in Example 5.1.
Assume the optimal solution is found by the SOLVE statement. Instead of quitting the OPTMODEL procedure, you can continue to solve several variations of the original problem.
Suppose the cost of cheese increases from 8 to 10 per unit and the cost of fish decreases from 11 to 7 per serving unit. You can change the parameters and solve the modified problem by submitting the following code:
cost['Cheese']=10; cost['Fish']=7; solve with lp/presolver=none basis=warmstart solver=ps printfreq=1; print diet;
Note that the primal simplex solver is preferred because the primal solution to the last-solved LP is still feasible for the modified problem in this case. The solution is shown in Output 5.2.1.
Problem Summary | |
---|---|
Objective Sense | Minimization |
Objective Function | f |
Objective Type | Linear |
Number of Variables | 6 |
Bounded Above | 0 |
Bounded Below | 5 |
Bounded Below and Above | 1 |
Free | 0 |
Fixed | 0 |
Number of Constraints | 4 |
Linear LE (<=) | 1 |
Linear EQ (=) | 0 |
Linear GE (>=) | 3 |
Linear Range | 0 |
Constraint Coefficients | 23 |
Solution Summary | |
---|---|
Solver | Primal Simplex |
Objective Function | f |
Solution Status | Optimal |
Objective Value | 10.980335514 |
Iterations | 4 |
Primal Infeasibility | 8.881784E-16 |
Dual Infeasibility | 0 |
Bound Infeasibility | 0 |
[1] | diet |
---|---|
Bread | 0.000000 |
Cheese | 0.449499 |
Fish | 0.500000 |
Milk | 0.053599 |
Potato | 1.865168 |
Yogurt | 0.000000 |
The following iteration log indicates that it takes the LP solver no more iterations to solve the modified problem by using BASIS=WARMSTART, since the optimal solution to the original problem remains optimal after the objective function is changed.
NOTE: There were 6 observations read from the data set WORK.FOODDATA. |
NOTE: The problem has 6 variables (0 free, 0 fixed). |
NOTE: The problem has 4 linear constraints (1 LE, 0 EQ, 3 GE, 0 range). |
NOTE: The problem has 23 linear constraint coefficients. |
NOTE: The problem has 0 nonlinear constraints (0 LE, 0 EQ, 0 GE, 0 range). |
NOTE: No basis information is available. The BASIS=WARMSTART option is ignored. |
NOTE: The OPTLP presolver value NONE is applied. |
NOTE: The PRIMAL SIMPLEX solver is called. |
Objective Entering Leaving |
Phase Iteration Value Variable Variable |
1 1 2.333259 diet[Cheese] prot_con (S) |
2 2 11.340909 diet[Potato] fat_con (S) |
2 3 11.065455 diet[Yogurt] cal_con (S) |
2 4 10.980336 diet[Milk] diet[Yogurt](S) |
NOTE: Optimal. |
NOTE: Objective = 10.9803355. |
Next, restore the original coefficients of the objective function and consider the case that you need a diet that supplies at least 150 calories. You can change the parameters and solve the modified problem by submitting the following code:
cost['Cheese']=8; cost['Fish']=11;cal_con.lb=150; solve with lp/presolver=none basis=warmstart solver=ds printfreq=1; print diet;
Note that the dual simplex solver is preferred because the dual solution to the last-solved LP is still feasible for the modified problem in this case. The solution is shown in Output 5.2.3.
Problem Summary | |
---|---|
Objective Sense | Minimization |
Objective Function | f |
Objective Type | Linear |
Number of Variables | 6 |
Bounded Above | 0 |
Bounded Below | 5 |
Bounded Below and Above | 1 |
Free | 0 |
Fixed | 0 |
Number of Constraints | 4 |
Linear LE (<=) | 1 |
Linear EQ (=) | 0 |
Linear GE (>=) | 3 |
Linear Range | 0 |
Constraint Coefficients | 23 |
Solution Summary | |
---|---|
Solver | Dual Simplex |
Objective Function | f |
Solution Status | Optimal |
Objective Value | 9.1744131985 |
Iterations | 3 |
Primal Infeasibility | 0 |
Dual Infeasibility | 0 |
Bound Infeasibility | 0 |
[1] | diet |
---|---|
Bread | 0.00000 |
Cheese | 0.18481 |
Fish | 0.50000 |
Milk | 0.56440 |
Potato | 0.14702 |
Yogurt | 0.00000 |
The following iteration log indicates that it takes the LP solver just one more phase II iteration to solve the modified problem by using BASIS=WARMSTART.
NOTE: There were 6 observations read from the data set WORK.FOODDATA. |
NOTE: The problem has 6 variables (0 free, 0 fixed). |
NOTE: The problem has 4 linear constraints (1 LE, 0 EQ, 3 GE, 0 range). |
NOTE: The problem has 23 linear constraint coefficients. |
NOTE: The problem has 0 nonlinear constraints (0 LE, 0 EQ, 0 GE, 0 range). |
NOTE: No basis information is available. The BASIS=WARMSTART option is ignored. |
NOTE: The OPTLP presolver value NONE is applied. |
NOTE: The DUAL SIMPLEX solver is called. |
Objective Entering Leaving |
Phase Iteration Value Variable Variable |
2 1 8.650000 diet[Milk] fat_con (S) |
2 2 8.925676 diet[Cheese] prot_con (S) |
2 3 9.174413 diet[Potato] carb_con (S) |
NOTE: Optimal. |
NOTE: Objective = 9.1744132. |
Next, restore the original constraint on calories and consider the case that you need a diet that supplies no more than 550 mg of sodium per day. The following row is appended to Table 5.5.
Bread |
Milk |
Cheese |
Potato |
Fish |
Yogurt |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sodium, mg |
148 |
122 |
337 |
186 |
56 |
132 |
You can change the parameters, add the new constraint, and solve the modified problem by submitting the following code:
cal_con.lb=300; num sod{FOOD}=[148 122 337 186 56 132]; con sodium: sum{i in FOOD}sod[i]*diet[i] <= 550; solve with lp/presolver=none basis=warmstart printfreq=1; print diet;
The solution is shown in Output 5.2.5.
Problem Summary | |
---|---|
Objective Sense | Minimization |
Objective Function | f |
Objective Type | Linear |
Number of Variables | 6 |
Bounded Above | 0 |
Bounded Below | 5 |
Bounded Below and Above | 1 |
Free | 0 |
Fixed | 0 |
Number of Constraints | 5 |
Linear LE (<=) | 2 |
Linear EQ (=) | 0 |
Linear GE (>=) | 3 |
Linear Range | 0 |
Constraint Coefficients | 29 |
Solution Summary | |
---|---|
Solver | Dual Simplex |
Objective Function | f |
Solution Status | Optimal |
Objective Value | 12.081337881 |
Iterations | 4 |
Primal Infeasibility | 0 |
Dual Infeasibility | 0 |
Bound Infeasibility | 0 |
[1] | diet |
---|---|
Bread | 0.000000 |
Cheese | 0.449499 |
Fish | 0.500000 |
Milk | 0.053599 |
Potato | 1.865168 |
Yogurt | 0.000000 |
The following iteration log indicates that it takes the LP solver no more iterations to solve the modified problem by using the BASIS=WARMSTART option, since the optimal solution to the original problem remains optimal after one more constraint is added.
NOTE: There were 6 observations read from the data set WORK.FOODDATA. |
NOTE: The problem has 6 variables (0 free, 0 fixed). |
NOTE: The problem has 5 linear constraints (2 LE, 0 EQ, 3 GE, 0 range). |
NOTE: The problem has 29 linear constraint coefficients. |
NOTE: The problem has 0 nonlinear constraints (0 LE, 0 EQ, 0 GE, 0 range). |
NOTE: No basis information is available. The BASIS=WARMSTART option is ignored. |
NOTE: The OPTLP presolver value NONE is applied. |
NOTE: The DUAL SIMPLEX solver is called. |
Objective Entering Leaving |
Phase Iteration Value Variable Variable |
2 1 8.650000 diet[Milk] fat_con (S) |
2 2 8.894231 diet[Yogurt] cal_con (S) |
2 3 11.552207 diet[Potato] prot_con (S) |
2 4 12.081338 diet[Cheese] diet[Yogurt](S) |
NOTE: Optimal. |
NOTE: Objective = 12.0813379. |