This example uses PROC TRANSREG to perform a preference mapping (PREFMAP) analysis (Carroll, 1972) of automobile preference data after a PROC PRINQUAL principal component analysis. The PREFMAP analysis is a response surface regression that locates ideal points for each dependent variable in a space defined by the independent variables.
The data are ratings obtained from 25 judges of their preference for each of 17 automobiles. The ratings were made on a scale
of zero (very weak preference) to nine (very strong preference). These judgments were made in 1980 about that year’s products.
There are two character variables that indicate the manufacturer and model of the automobile. The data set also contains three
ratings: miles per gallon (MPG
), projected reliability (Reliability
), and quality of the ride (Ride
). These ratings are on a scale of one (bad) to five (good). PROC PRINQUAL creates an OUT= data set containing standardized principal component scores (Prin1
and Prin2
), along with the ID variables Model
, MPG
, Reliability
, and Ride
.
While this data set contains all of the information needed for the subsequent preference mapping, you can make slightly more
informative plots by adding new variable labels to the principal component score variables. The default labels are ’Component
1’, ’Component 2’, and so on. These are by necessity rather generic since they are created before any data are read, and they
must be appropriate across BY groups when a BY variable is specified. In contrast, the MDPREF plot in PROC PRINQUAL has axis
labels of the form ’Component 1 (43.54%)’ and ’Component 2 (23.4%)’ that show the proportion of variance accounted for by
each component. You can create an output data set from the MDPREF plot by using the ODS OUTPUT statement and then use only
the label information from it to reset the labels in the output data set from PROC PRINQUAL. In the DATA PLOT step, the SET
statement for the MD
data set is specified before the SET statement for the PRESULTS data set. The if 0
ensures that no data are actually read from it, but nevertheless the properties of the Prin1
and Prin2
variables including the variable labels are set based on the properties of those variables in the MD
data set.
The first PROC TRANSREG step fits univariate regression models for MPG
and Reliability
. All variables are designated IDENTITY. A vector drawn in the plot of Prin1
and Prin2
from the origin to the point defined by an attribute’s regression coefficients approximately shows how the autos differ on
that attribute. See Carroll (1972) for more information. The Prin1
and Prin2
columns of the TResult1
OUT= data set contain the automobile coordinates (_Type_
=’SCORE’ observations) and endpoints of the MPG
and Reliability
vectors (_Type_
=’M COEFFI’ observations).
The second PROC TRANSREG step fits a univariate regression model with Ride
designated IDENTITY, and Prin1
and Prin2
designated POINT. The POINT expansion creates an additional independent variable _ISSQ_
, which contains the sum of Prin1
squared and Prin2
squared. The OUT= data set TResult2
contains no _Type_
=’SCORE’ observations, only ideal point (_Type_
=’M POINT’) coordinates for Ride
. The coordinates of both the vectors and the ideal points are output by specifying COORDINATES in the OUTPUT statement in PROC TRANSREG.
A vector model is used for MPG
and Reliability
because perfectly efficient and reliable automobiles do not exist in the data set. The ideal points for MPG
and Reliability
are far removed from the plot of the automobiles. It is more likely that an ideal point for quality of the ride is in the
plot, so an ideal point model is used for the ride variable. See Carroll (1972) and Schiffman, Reynolds, and Young (1981) for discussions of the vector model and point models (including the EPOINT and QPOINT versions of the point model that are not used in this example). For the vector model, the default coordinates stretch factor
of 2.5 was used. This extends the vectors by a factor of 2.5 from their standard lengths, making a better graphical display.
Sometimes the default vectors are short and near the origin, and they look better when they are extended.
The following statements produce Output 97.6.1 through Output 97.6.5:
title 'Preference Ratings for Automobiles Manufactured in 1980'; options validvarname=any; data CarPreferences; input Make $ 1-10 Model $ 12-22 @25 ('1'n-'25'n) (1.) MPG Reliability Ride; datalines; Cadillac Eldorado 8007990491240508971093809 3 2 4 Chevrolet Chevette 0051200423451043003515698 5 3 2 Chevrolet Citation 4053305814161643544747795 4 1 5 Chevrolet Malibu 6027400723121345545668658 3 3 4 Ford Fairmont 2024006715021443530648655 3 3 4 Ford Mustang 5007197705021101850657555 3 2 2 Ford Pinto 0021000303030201500514078 4 1 1 Honda Accord 5956897609699952998975078 5 5 3 Honda Civic 4836709507488852567765075 5 5 3 Lincoln Continental 7008990592230409962091909 2 4 5 Plymouth Gran Fury 7006000434101107333458708 2 1 5 Plymouth Horizon 3005005635461302444675655 4 3 3 Plymouth Volare 4005003614021602754476555 2 1 3 Pontiac Firebird 0107895613201206958265907 1 1 5 Volkswagen Dasher 4858696508877795377895000 5 3 4 Volkswagen Rabbit 4858509709695795487885000 5 4 3 Volvo DL 9989998909999987989919000 4 5 5 ;
ods graphics on; * Compute Coordinates for a 2-Dimensional Scatter Plot of Automobiles; proc prinqual data=CarPreferences out=PResults(drop='1'n-'25'n) n=2 replace standard scores mdpref=2; id Model MPG Reliability Ride; transform identity('1'n-'25'n); title2 'Multidimensional Preference (MDPREF) Analysis'; ods output mdprefplot=md; run; options validvarname=v7; title2 'Preference Mapping (PREFMAP) Analysis'; * Add the Labels from the Plot to the Results Data Set; data plot; if 0 then set md(keep=prin:); set presults; run; * Compute Endpoints for MPG and Reliability Vectors; proc transreg data=plot rsquare; Model identity(MPG Reliability)=identity(Prin1 Prin2); output tstandard=center coordinates replace out=TResult1; id Model; run; * Compute Ride Ideal Point Coordinates; proc transreg data=plot rsquare; Model identity(Ride)=point(Prin1 Prin2); output tstandard=center coordinates replace noscores out=TResult2; id Model; run; proc print; run;
Output 97.6.1: Preference Ratings Example Output
Preference Ratings for Automobiles Manufactured in 1980 |
Multidimensional Preference (MDPREF) Analysis |
PRINQUAL MTV Algorithm Iteration History | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iteration Number |
Average Change |
Maximum Change |
Proportion of Variance |
Criterion Change |
Note |
1 | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.66946 | Converged |
Algorithm converged. |
Output 97.6.3 shows that an unreliable-to-reliable direction extends from the left and slightly below the origin to the right and slightly
above the origin. The Japanese and European automobiles are rated, on the average, as more reliable. A low MPG
to good MPG
direction extends from the top left of the plot to the bottom right. The smaller automobiles, on the average, get better
gas mileage.
Output 97.6.3: Preference Mapping Vector Plot
Preference Ratings for Automobiles Manufactured in 1980 |
Preference Mapping (PREFMAP) Analysis |
R-Square | 0.5720 |
---|
R-Square | 0.5086 |
---|
The ideal point for Ride
in Output 97.6.4 is in the top, just right of the center of the plot. Automobiles near the Ride
ideal point tend to have a better ride than automobiles far away. It can be seen from the R squares that none of these ratings
perfectly fits the model, so all of the interpretations are approximate.
Output 97.6.4: Preference Mapping Ideal Point Plot
Preference Ratings for Automobiles Manufactured in 1980 |
Preference Mapping (PREFMAP) Analysis |
R-Square | 0.3780 |
---|
The Ride
point is a “negative-negative” ideal point. The point models assume that small ratings mean the object (automobile) is similar to the rating name and large
ratings imply dissimilarity to the rating name. Because the opposite scoring is used, the interpretation of the Ride
point must be reversed to a negative ideal point (bad ride). However, the coefficient for the _ISSQ_
variable in Output 97.6.5 is negative, so the interpretation is reversed again, back to the original interpretation.
Output 97.6.5: Preference Mapping Ideal Point Coefficients
Preference Ratings for Automobiles Manufactured in 1980 |
Preference Mapping (PREFMAP) Analysis |
Obs | _TYPE_ | _NAME_ | Ride | Intercept | Prin1 | Prin2 | _ISSQ_ | Model |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M POINT | Ride | . | . | 0.49461 | 2.46539 | -0.17448 | Ride |