Usage Note 24457: Why is there no intercept parameter in the output of PROC PHREG?
No intercept is used in the underlying Cox regression model fit by PROC PHREG. Hence, PROC PHREG does not estimate an intercept parameter.
Essentially, the intercept is absorbed into the unknown and unspecified baseline hazard, h0(t). Suppose an intercept, β0, exists. Then the underlying Cox proportional hazards model is h(t) = h0(t) exp(β0 + β1x1 + ... + βkxk) or equivalently h(t) = h0*(t) exp(β1x1 + β2x2 + ... + βkxk), where h0*(t) = h0(t) exp(β0). So, the intercept is involved as just another constant that is part of the baseline hazard. The baseline hazard is unknown and unspecified and is done away with in the partial likelihood method as discussed by Cox (1972).
An intercept term could potentially be introduced using the OFFSET= option. However, this would not affect the results and, in particular, the intercept would cancel out of any hazard ratio(s).
__________
Cox, D. R. 1972. "Regression Models and Life-Tables (with Discussion)." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 34:187-220.
Operating System and Release Information
*
For software releases that are not yet generally available, the Fixed
Release is the software release in which the problem is planned to be
fixed.
Because it is absorbed into the unknown and unspecified baseline hazard function.
| Type: | Usage Note |
| Priority: | low |
| Topic: | SAS Reference ==> Procedures ==> PHREG
|
| Date Modified: | 2017-10-31 10:50:54 |
| Date Created: | 2005-11-14 16:28:57 |