Two-Stage Dorfman Screening
/****************************************************************/
/* S A S S A M P L E L I B R A R Y */
/* */
/* NAME: IEDORF2 */
/* TITLE: Two-Stage Dorfman Screening */
/* PRODUCT: QC */
/* SYSTEM: ALL */
/* KEYS: Inspection Sampling, */
/* PROCS: TABULATE */
/* DATA: */
/* */
/* MISC: */
/* */
/* NOTES: This program tabulates measures of effectiveness */
/* for two-stage Dorfman screening of an infinite lot */
/* under an imperfect inspection model. */
/* */
/* Notation: */
/* */
/* omega = proportion of nonconforming (defective) */
/* items in lot */
/* */
/* n0 = number of items in initial group */
/* n1 = number of items in second group */
/* */
/* p0 = Pr[ for initial group, declare NC | at */
/* least one NC item ] */
/* p0prime = Pr[ for initial group, declare NC | no */
/* NC items ] */
/* */
/* p1 = Pr[ for first subgroup, declare NC | at */
/* least one NC item ] */
/* p1prime = Pr[ for first subgroup, declare NC | no */
/* NC items ] */
/* */
/* pcnc = Pr[ correct classification of defective */
/* (nonconforming) item ] */
/* */
/* pcc = Pr[ correctly classifying conforming */
/* item ] */
/* */
/* EPR = pct reduction in expected number of tests */
/* */
/* Comment by RNR on 13SEP91: */
/* It appears that the values of EPR in Table 2 of Kotz */
/* and Johnson (1982) are in error (these values were */
/* reprinted in Table 7 of Johnson et al. (1987)). This */
/* program computes EPR using equations published in two */
/* different references (see below), and the results are */
/* in agreement. */
/* */
/* */
/* REF: Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., and Rodriguez, R. N. */
/* (1987), Statistical Effects of Imperfect Inspection */
/* Sampling: III. Screening (Group Testing), Journal */
/* of Quality Technology 20, 98-124. See Table 8. */
/* */
/* Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., and Wu, X. (1991). */
/* Inspection Errors for Attributes in Quality */
/* Control. London: Chapman & Hall. See Chapter 6. */
/* */
/* Kotz, S. and Johnson, N. L. (1982), Errors in */
/* Inspection and Grading: Distributional Aspects of */
/* Screening and Hierarchal Screening, Communications */
/* in Statistics--Theory and Methods 11(18), 1997- */
/* 2016. */
/* */
/* */
/****************************************************************/
data table;
keep omega n0 n1 p0 p1 p2 p0prime p1prime p2prime
pcc pcnc book kj82 ;
label omega = 'omega'
n0 = 'n0'
n1 = 'n1'
p0 = 'p0'
p1 = 'p1'
p2 = 'p'
p0prime = 'p0'''
p1prime = 'p1'''
p2prime = 'p'''
pcc = 'PC(C)'
pcnc = 'PC(NC)'
book = 'JKW91 EPR'
kj82 = 'KJ82 EPR' ;
format pcc 6.4 pcnc 6.4 book kj82 4.1 ;
input n0 n1 @;
/*--- find hi---*/
h1 = n0 / n1;
/*---additional parameters---*/
omega = 0.05;
p0 = 0.98;
p1 = 0.98;
p2 = 0.98;
p0prime = 0.05;
p1prime = 0.05;
p2prime = 0.05;
/*---find pcnc = Pr[ correct given nc ]---*/
pcnc = p0 * p1 * p2 ;
/*---evaluate p0*(n) and p0(n) for n = n0, n1---*/
p0starn0 = (1 - omega) ** ( n0 - 1 );
p0starn1 = (1 - omega) ** ( n1 - 1 );
p0n0 = (1 - omega) ** n0 ;
p0n1 = (1 - omega) ** n1 ;
/*---find pcc---*/
term1 = p0starn0 * p0prime * p1prime * p2prime ;
term2 = ( p0starn1 - p0starn0 ) *
p0 * p1prime * p2prime ;
term3 = ( 1 - p0starn1 ) * p0 * p1 * p2prime ;
pcc = 1 - ( term1 + term2 + term3 );
/*---preliminary work for expected percent reduction---*/
pi0 = 1;
pi1 = p0n0 * p0prime + ( 1 - p0n0 ) * p0 ;
pi2 = p0n0 * p0prime * p1prime +
( p0n1 - p0n0 ) * p0 * p1prime +
( 1 - p0n1 ) * p0 * p1 ;
h2 = n1;
/*---using equation (6.19) on page 88 of JKW---*/
term0 = pi0 / ( h1 * h2 );
term1 = pi1 / h2 ;
term2 = pi2 ;
en0 = term0 + term1 + term2;
book = 100 * ( 1 - en0 );
/*---using equation (21.4) of Kotz and Johnson (1982)---*/
psub1 = p0n0 * ( p0 - p0prime );
psub2 = p0n1 * ( p1 - p1prime );
epr = 1 - ( 1 / n0 )
- ( p0 * p1 )
- ( p0 - psub1 ) / n1
+ psub1 * p1prime
+ psub2 * p0 ;
kj82 = epr * 100 ;
/*---output observation---*/
output;
cards;
6 2
6 3
12 2
12 3
12 4
12 6
run;
proc sort data=table;
by omega p0 p1 p2 p0prime p1prime p2prime ;
proc print label noobs;
by omega p0 p1 p2 p0prime p1prime p2prime ;
var n0 n1 pcnc pcc book kj82 ;
run;