Four surgical operations for duodenal ulcers are compared in a clinical trial at four hospitals. The operations performed
are as follows: Treatment
= a, drainage and vagotomy; Treatment
= b, 25% resection and vagotomy; Treatment
= c, 50% resection and vagotomy; and Treatment
= d, 75% resection. The response is severity of an undesirable complication called “dumping syndrome.” The data in the following statements are from Grizzle, Starmer, and Koch (1969, pp. 489–504).
data operate; input Hospital Treatment $ Severity $ wt @@; datalines; 1 a none 23 1 a slight 7 1 a moderate 2 1 b none 23 1 b slight 10 1 b moderate 5 1 c none 20 1 c slight 13 1 c moderate 5 1 d none 24 1 d slight 10 1 d moderate 6 2 a none 18 2 a slight 6 2 a moderate 1 2 b none 18 2 b slight 6 2 b moderate 2 2 c none 13 2 c slight 13 2 c moderate 2 2 d none 9 2 d slight 15 2 d moderate 2 3 a none 8 3 a slight 6 3 a moderate 3 3 b none 12 3 b slight 4 3 b moderate 4 3 c none 11 3 c slight 6 3 c moderate 2 3 d none 7 3 d slight 7 3 d moderate 4 4 a none 12 4 a slight 9 4 a moderate 1 4 b none 15 4 b slight 3 4 b moderate 2 4 c none 14 4 c slight 8 4 c moderate 3 4 d none 13 4 d slight 6 4 d moderate 4 ;
The response variable (Severity
) is ordinally scaled with three levels, so assignment of scores is appropriate (0 = none, 0.5 = slight, 1 = moderate). For
these scores, the response function yields the mean score. The following statements produce Output 32.2.1 through Output 32.2.3:
title 'Dumping Syndrome Data'; proc catmod data=operate order=data ; weight wt; response 0 0.5 1; model Severity=Treatment Hospital / freq oneway design; title2 'Main-Effects Model'; quit;
The ORDER= option is specified so that the levels of the response variable remain in the correct order. A main-effects model is fit. The ONEWAY option produces a table of the number of subjects within each variable level, and the FREQ option displays the frequency of each response within each sample (Output 32.2.1).
Output 32.2.1: Surgical Data: Analysis of Mean Scores
Dumping Syndrome Data |
Main-Effects Model |
Data Summary | |||
---|---|---|---|
Response | Severity | Response Levels | 3 |
Weight Variable | wt | Populations | 16 |
Data Set | OPERATE | Total Frequency | 417 |
Frequency Missing | 0 | Observations | 48 |
One-Way Frequencies | ||
---|---|---|
Variable | Value | Frequency |
Severity | none | 240 |
slight | 129 | |
moderate | 48 | |
Treatment | a | 96 |
b | 104 | |
c | 110 | |
d | 107 | |
Hospital | 1 | 148 |
2 | 105 | |
3 | 74 | |
4 | 90 |
Population Profiles | |||
---|---|---|---|
Sample | Treatment | Hospital | Sample Size |
1 | a | 1 | 32 |
2 | a | 2 | 25 |
3 | a | 3 | 17 |
4 | a | 4 | 22 |
5 | b | 1 | 38 |
6 | b | 2 | 26 |
7 | b | 3 | 20 |
8 | b | 4 | 20 |
9 | c | 1 | 38 |
10 | c | 2 | 28 |
11 | c | 3 | 19 |
12 | c | 4 | 25 |
13 | d | 1 | 40 |
14 | d | 2 | 26 |
15 | d | 3 | 18 |
16 | d | 4 | 23 |
Response Profiles | |
---|---|
Response | Severity |
1 | none |
2 | slight |
3 | moderate |
Response Frequencies | |||
---|---|---|---|
Sample | Response Number | ||
1 | 2 | 3 | |
1 | 23 | 7 | 2 |
2 | 18 | 6 | 1 |
3 | 8 | 6 | 3 |
4 | 12 | 9 | 1 |
5 | 23 | 10 | 5 |
6 | 18 | 6 | 2 |
7 | 12 | 4 | 4 |
8 | 15 | 3 | 2 |
9 | 20 | 13 | 5 |
10 | 13 | 13 | 2 |
11 | 11 | 6 | 2 |
12 | 14 | 8 | 3 |
13 | 24 | 10 | 6 |
14 | 9 | 15 | 2 |
15 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
16 | 13 | 6 | 4 |
You can use the one-way frequencies and the response profiles from Output 32.2.1 to verify that the response levels are in the desired order (none, slight, moderate) so that the response scores (0, 0.5, 1.0) are applied appropriately. If the ORDER=DATA option had not been used, the levels would have been in a different order.
The analysis of variance table (Output 32.2.2) shows that the additive model fits (since the residual chi-square is not significant), that the Treatment
effect is significant, and that the Hospital
effect is not significant.
Output 32.2.2: Surgical Data: Analysis of Mean Scores
Response Functions and Design Matrix | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | Response Function |
Design Matrix | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | 0.17188 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0.16000 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
3 | 0.35294 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
4 | 0.25000 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
5 | 0.26316 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 0.19231 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
7 | 0.30000 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
8 | 0.17500 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
9 | 0.30263 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
10 | 0.30357 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
11 | 0.26316 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
12 | 0.28000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
13 | 0.27500 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
14 | 0.36538 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
15 | 0.41667 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
16 | 0.30435 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
Analysis of Variance | |||
---|---|---|---|
Source | DF | Chi-Square | Pr > ChiSq |
Intercept | 1 | 248.77 | <.0001 |
Treatment | 3 | 8.90 | 0.0307 |
Hospital | 3 | 2.33 | 0.5065 |
Residual | 9 | 6.33 | 0.7069 |
The coefficients of Treatment
in Output 32.2.3 show that the first two treatments (with negative coefficients) have lower mean scores than the last two treatments (the
fourth coefficient, not shown, must be positive since the four coefficients must sum to zero). In other words, the less severe
treatments (the first two) cause significantly less severe dumping syndrome complications.
Output 32.2.3: Surgical Data: Analysis of Mean Scores
Analysis of Weighted Least Squares Estimates | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Estimate | Standard Error |
Chi- Square |
Pr > ChiSq | |
Intercept | 0.2724 | 0.0173 | 248.77 | <.0001 | |
Treatment | a | -0.0552 | 0.0270 | 4.17 | 0.0411 |
b | -0.0365 | 0.0289 | 1.59 | 0.2073 | |
c | 0.0248 | 0.0280 | 0.78 | 0.3757 | |
Hospital | 1 | -0.0204 | 0.0264 | 0.60 | 0.4388 |
2 | -0.0178 | 0.0268 | 0.44 | 0.5055 | |
3 | 0.0531 | 0.0352 | 2.28 | 0.1312 |