The STDIZE Procedure

The following table lists standardization methods and their corresponding location and scale measures available with the METHOD= option.

For METHOD=ABW(c), METHOD=AHUBER(c), or METHOD=AWAVE(c), c is a positive numeric tuning constant.

For METHOD=AGK(p), p is a numeric constant that gives the proportion of pairs to be included in the estimation of the within-cluster variances.

For METHOD=SPACING(p), p is a numeric constant that gives the proportion of data to be contained in the spacing.

For METHOD=L(p), p is a numeric constant greater than or equal to 1 that specifies the power to which differences are to be raised in computing an L(p) or Minkowski metric.

For METHOD=IN(ds), ds is the name of a SAS data set that meets either of the following two conditions:

PROC STDIZE reads in the location and scale variables in the ds data set by first looking for the _TYPE_ variable in the ds data set. If it finds this variable, PROC STDIZE continues to search for all variables specified in the VAR statement. If it does not find the _TYPE_ variable, PROC STDIZE searches for the location variables specified in the LOCATION statement and the scale variables specified in the SCALE statement.

The variable _TYPE_ can also contain the optional observations, 'ADD' and 'MULT'. If these observations are found in the ds data set, the values in the observation of _TYPE_ = 'MULT' are the multiplication constants, and the values in the observation of _TYPE_ = 'ADD' are the addition constants; otherwise, the constants specified in the ADD= and MULT= options (or their default values) are used.

For robust estimators, see Goodall (1983) and Iglewicz (1983). The MAD method has the highest breakdown point (50%), but it is somewhat inefficient. The ABW, AHUBER, and AWAVE methods provide a good compromise between breakdown and efficiency. The L(p) location estimates are increasingly robust as p drops from 2 (which corresponds to least squares, or mean estimation) to 1 (which corresponds to least absolute value, or median estimation). However, the L(p) scale estimates are not robust.

The SPACING method is robust to both outliers and clustering (Janssen et al., 1995) and is, therefore, a good choice for cluster analysis or nonparametric density estimation. The mid-minimum spacing method estimates the mode for small p. The AGK method is also robust to clustering and more efficient than the SPACING method, but it is not as robust to outliers and takes longer to compute. If you expect g clusters, the argument to METHOD=SPACING or METHOD=AGK should be or less. The AGK method is less biased than the SPACING method for small samples. As a general guide, it is reasonable to use AGK for samples of size 100 or less and SPACING for samples of size 1,000 or more, with the treatment of intermediate sample sizes depending on the available computer resources.