The following notation is used in this section:
|
u |
expected number of nonconformities per unit produced by the process |
|
|
|
number of nonconformities per unit in the ith subgroup |
|
|
|
total number of nonconformities in the ith subgroup |
|
|
|
number of inspection units in the ith subgroup. Typically, |
|
|
|
average number of nonconformities per unit taken across subgroups. The quantity
|
|
|
N |
number of subgroups |
|
|
|
has a central |
Each point on a c chart represents the total number of nonconformities (
) in a subgroup. For example, Figure 17.24 displays three sections of pipeline that are inspected for defective welds (indicated by an X). Each section represents a subgroup composed of a number of inspection units, which are 1000-foot-long sections. The number of units in the ith subgroup is denoted by
, which is the subgroup sample size. The value of
can be fractional; Figure 17.24 shows
units in the third subgroup.
Figure 17.24: Terminology for c Charts and u Charts

The number of nonconformities in the ith subgroup is denoted by
. The number of nonconformities per unit in the ith subgroup is denoted by
. In Figure 17.24, the number of welds per inspection unit in the third subgroup is
.
A u chart created with the UCHART statement plots the quantity
for the ith subgroup (see UCHART Statement: SHEWHART Procedure). An advantage of a u chart is that the value of the central line at the ith subgroup does not depend on
. This is not the case for a c chart, and consequently, a u chart is often preferred when the number of units
is not constant across subgroups.
On a c chart, the central line indicates an estimate for
, which is computed as
. If you specify a known value (
) for u, the central line indicates the value of
.
Note that the central line varies with subgroup sample size
. When
for all subgroups, the central line has the constant value
.
You can compute the limits in the following ways:
as a specified multiple (k) of the standard error of
above and below the central line. The default limits are computed with k = 3 (these are referred to as
limits).
as probability limits defined in terms of
, a specified probability that
exceeds the limits
The lower and upper control limits, LCLC and UCLC respectively, are given by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The upper and lower control limits vary with the number of inspection units per subgroup
. If
for all subgroups, the control limits have constant values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An upper probability limit UCLC for
can be determined using the fact that
|
|
The upper probability limit UCLC is then calculated by setting
|
|
and solving for UCLC.
A similar approach is used to calculate the lower probability limit LCLC, using the fact that
|
|
The lower probability limit LCLC is then calculated by setting
|
|
and solving for LCLC. This assumes that the process is in statistical control and that
has a Poisson distribution. For more information, refer to Johnson, Kotz, and Kemp (1992). Note that the probability limits vary with the number of inspection units per subgroup (
) and are asymmetric about the central line.
If a standard value
is available for u, replace
with
in the formulas for the control limits. You can specify parameters for the limits as follows:
Specify k with the SIGMAS= option or with the variable _SIGMAS_ in a LIMITS= data set.
Specify
with the ALPHA= option or with the variable _ALPHA_ in a LIMITS= data set.
Specify a constant nominal sample size
for the control limits with the LIMITN= option or with the variable _LIMITN_ in a LIMITS= data set.
Specify
with the U0= option or with the variable _U_ in a LIMITS= data set.