Recall the linear programming problem presented in Chapter 3: Introduction to Optimization in SAS/OR 12.1 User's Guide: Mathematical Programming. In that problem, a firm produces two products, chocolates and gumdrops, that are processed by four processes: cooking, color/flavor, condiments, and packaging. The objective is to determine the product mix that maximizes the profit to the firm while not exceeding manufacturing capacities. The problem is extended to demonstrate a use of integer-constrained variables.
Suppose that you must manufacture only one of the two products. In addition, there is a setup cost of 100 if you make the
chocolates and 75 if you make the gumdrops. To identify which product will maximize profit, you define two zero-one integer
variables, ICHOCO
and IGUMDR
, and you also define two new constraints, CHOCOLATE
and GUM
. The constraint labeled CHOCOLATE
forces ICHOCO
to equal one when chocolates are manufactured. Similarly, the constraint labeled GUM
forces IGUMDR
to equal 1 when gumdrops are manufactured. Also, you should include a constraint labeled ONLY_ONE
that requires the sum of ICHOCO
and IGUMDR
to equal 1. (Note that this could be accomplished more simply by including ICHOCO
and IGUMDR
in a SOSEQ set.) Since ICHOCO
and IGUMDR
are integer variables, this constraint eliminates the possibility of both products being manufactured. Notice the coefficients
-10000, which are used to force ICHOCO
or IGUMDR
to 1 whenever CHOCO
and GUMDR
are nonzero. This technique, which is often used in integer programming, can cause severe numerical problems. If this driving
coefficient is too large, then arithmetic overflows and underflow may result. If the driving coefficient is too small, then
the integer variable may not be driven to 1 as desired by the modeler.
The objective coefficients of the integer variables ICHOCO
and IGUMDR
are the negatives of the setup costs for the two products. The following is the data set that describes this problem and
the call to PROC LP to solve it:
data; format _row_ $10. ; input _row_ $ choco gumdr ichoco igumdr _type_ $ _rhs_; datalines; object .25 .75 -100 -75 max . cooking 15 40 0 0 le 27000 color 0 56.25 0 0 le 27000 package 18.75 0 0 0 le 27000 condiments 12 50 0 0 le 27000 chocolate 1 0 -10000 0 le 0 gum 0 1 0 -10000 le 0 only_one 0 0 1 1 eq 1 binary . . 1 2 binary . ;
proc lp; run;
The solution shows that gumdrops are produced. See Output 6.8.1.
Output 6.8.1: Summaries and an Integer Programming Iteration Log
Problem Summary | |
---|---|
Objective Function | Max object |
Rhs Variable | _rhs_ |
Type Variable | _type_ |
Problem Density (%) | 25.71 |
Variables | Number |
Non-negative | 2 |
Binary | 2 |
Slack | 6 |
Total | 10 |
Constraints | Number |
LE | 6 |
EQ | 1 |
Objective | 1 |
Total | 8 |
Integer Iteration Log | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iter | Problem | Condition | Objective | Branched | Value | Sinfeas | Active | Proximity |
1 | 0 | ACTIVE | 397.5 | igumdr | 0.9 | 0.2 | 2 | . |
2 | 1 | SUBOPTIMAL | 260 | . | . | . | 1 | 70 |
3 | -1 | SUBOPTIMAL | 285 | . | . | . | 0 | . |
Solution Summary | |
---|---|
Integer Optimal Solution |
|
Objective Value | 285 |
Phase 1 Iterations | 0 |
Phase 2 Iterations | 5 |
Phase 3 Iterations | 5 |
Integer Iterations | 3 |
Integer Solutions | 2 |
Initial Basic Feasible Variables | 9 |
Time Used (seconds) | 0 |
Number of Inversions | 5 |
Epsilon | 1E-8 |
Infinity | 1.797693E308 |
Maximum Phase 1 Iterations | 100 |
Maximum Phase 2 Iterations | 100 |
Maximum Phase 3 Iterations | 99999999 |
Maximum Integer Iterations | 100 |
Time Limit (seconds) | 120 |
Variable Summary | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Col | Variable Name | Status | Type | Price | Activity | Reduced Cost |
1 | choco | DEGEN | NON-NEG | 0.25 | 0 | 0 |
2 | gumdr | BASIC | NON-NEG | 0.75 | 480 | 0 |
3 | ichoco | DEGEN | BINARY | -100 | 0 | 0 |
4 | igumdr | BINARY | -75 | 1 | -2475 | |
5 | cooking | BASIC | SLACK | 0 | 7800 | 0 |
6 | color | SLACK | 0 | 0 | -0.013333 | |
7 | package | BASIC | SLACK | 0 | 27000 | 0 |
8 | condiments | BASIC | SLACK | 0 | 3000 | 0 |
9 | chocolate | SLACK | 0 | 0 | -0.25 | |
10 | gum | BASIC | SLACK | 0 | 9520 | 0 |
Constraint Summary | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Row | Constraint Name | Type | S/S Col | Rhs | Activity | Dual Activity |
1 | object | OBJECTVE | . | 0 | 285 | . |
2 | cooking | LE | 5 | 27000 | 19200 | 0 |
3 | color | LE | 6 | 27000 | 27000 | 0.0133333 |
4 | package | LE | 7 | 27000 | 0 | 0 |
5 | condiments | LE | 8 | 27000 | 24000 | 0 |
6 | chocolate | LE | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 |
7 | gum | LE | 10 | 0 | -9520 | 0 |
8 | only_one | EQ | . | 1 | 1 | 2400 |
The branch-and-bound tree can be reconstructed from the information contained in the integer iteration log. The column labeled
Iter
numbers the integer iterations. The column labeled Problem
identifies the Iter
number of the parent problem from which the current problem is defined. For example, Iter
=2 has Problem
=-1. This means that problem 2 is a direct descendant of problem 1. Furthermore, because problem 1 branched on ICHOCO
, you know that problem 2 is identical to problem 1 with an additional constraint on variable ICHOCO
. The minus sign in the Problem
=-1 in Iter
=2 tells you that the new constraint on variable ICHOCO
is a lower bound. Moreover, because Value
=0.1 in Iter
=1, you know that ICHOCO
=0.1 in Iter
=1 so that the added constraint in Iter
=2 is ICHOCO
. In this way, the information in the log can be used to reconstruct the branch-and-bound tree. In fact, when you save an
ACTIVEOUT= data set, it contains information in this format that is used to reconstruct the tree when you restart a problem using the
ACTIVEIN= data set. See Example 6.10.
Note that if you defined a SOSEQ special ordered set containing the variables CHOCO
and GUMDR
, the integer variables ICHOCO
and IGUMDR
and the three associated constraints would not have been needed.