PROC VARMAX: Causality Testing :: SAS/ETS(R) 9.22 User's Guide

The VARMAX Procedure

Causality Testing

The following statements use the CAUSAL statement to compute the Granger causality test for a VAR(1) model. For the Granger causality tests, the autoregressive order should be defined by the P= option in the MODEL statement. The variable groups are defined in the MODEL statement as well. Regardless of whether the variables specified in the GROUP1= and GROUP2= options are designated as dependent or exogenous (independent) variables in the MODEL statement, the CAUSAL statement fits the VAR(p) model by considering the variables in the two groups as dependent variables.

/*--- Causality Testing ---*/

proc varmax data=grunfeld;
   model y1-y3 = x1 x2 / p=1 noprint;
   causal group1=(x1) group2=(y1-y3);
   causal group1=(y3) group2=(y1 y2);
run;

The output in Figure 32.24 is associated with the CAUSAL statement. The first CAUSAL statement fits the VAR(1) model by using the variables $\text{[math]}$ , $\text{[math]}$ , $\text{[math]}$ , and $\text{[math]}$ . The second CAUSAL statement fits the VAR(1) model by using the variables $\text{[math]}$ , $\text{[math]}$ , and $\text{[math]}$ .

Figure 32.24 CAUSAL Statement Results

The VARMAX Procedure

Granger-Causality Wald Test
Test	DF	Chi-Square	Pr > ChiSq
1	3	2.40	0.4946
2	2	262.88	<.0001

Test 1: Group 1 Variables:	x1
Group 2 Variables:	y1 y2 y3

Test 2: Group 1 Variables:	y3
Group 2 Variables:	y1 y2

The null hypothesis of the Granger causality test is that GROUP1 is influenced only by itself, and not by GROUP2.

The first column in the output is the index corresponding to each CAUSAL statement. The output shows that you cannot reject that $\text{[math]}$ is influenced by itself and not by $\text{[math]}$ at the 0.05 significance level for Test 1. You can reject that $\text{[math]}$ is influenced by itself and not by $\text{[math]}$ for Test 2. See the section VAR and VARX Modeling for details.

Top of Page