Problem Note 9835: PROC OPTEX fails to output correct design with the NUMBER=*BEST options
on the OUTPUT statement when using CRITERION=A
PROC OPTEX fails to output the correct design when specifying an OUTPUT
statement for CRITERION=A with any of the NUMBER=*BEST options,
where * can be G,A,D or V.
To circumvent the problem, you can visually examine the table of
efficiencies and explicitly set NUMBER=n in the OUTPUT statement to
output the one with maximal D-, A-, or G- efficiency for NUMBER=DBEST,
ABEST or GBEST or the one with the minimum Average Prediction Standard
Error for NUMBER=VBEST.
A Technical Support hot fix for Release 8.2 (TS2M0) for this
issue is available at:
http://www.sas.com/techsup/download/hotfix/82_sbcs_prod_list.html#009835
For customers running SAS with Asian Language Support (DBCS), this
hot fix should be downloaded from:
http://www.sas.com/techsup/download/hotfix/82_dbcs_prod_list.html#009835
Operating System and Release Information
| SAS System | SAS/QC | Microsoft Windows XP Professional | 8.2 TS2M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| Microsoft® Windows® for 64-Bit Itanium-based Systems | 9 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| OpenVMS VAX | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| IRIX | 8.2 TS2M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| Solaris | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| 64-bit Enabled Solaris | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| HP-UX | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| ABI+ for Intel Architecture | 8.2 TS2M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| Linux | 8.2 TS2M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| z/OS | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| HP-UX IPF | 9 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| 64-bit Enabled HP-UX | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| CMS | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| OpenVMS Alpha | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| 64-bit Enabled AIX | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| Tru64 UNIX | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
| AIX | 8 TS M0 | 9.2 TS1M0 |
*
For software releases that are not yet generally available, the Fixed
Release is the software release in which the problem is planned to be
fixed.
| Type: | Problem Note |
| Priority: | alert |
| Topic: | Analytics ==> Design of Experiments
SAS Reference ==> Procedures ==> OPTEX
|
| Date Modified: | 2008-11-26 12:44:09 |
| Date Created: | 2003-04-21 07:37:43 |
