The SEQDESIGN Procedure |
Boundary Scales |
The boundaries computed by the SEQDESIGN procedure are applied to test statistics computed during the analysis, and so generally, the scale you select for the boundaries is determined by the scale of the statistics that you will be using.
The following scales are available in the SEQDESIGN procedure:
These scales are all equivalent for a given set of boundary values—that is, there exists a unique transformation between any two of these scales. If you know the boundary values in terms of statistics from one scale, you can uniquely derive the boundary values of statistics for other scales. You can specify the scale with the BOUNDARYSCALE= option; the default is BOUNDARYSCALE=STDZ, the standardized scale.
You can also select the boundary scale to better examine the features of an individual group sequential design or to compare features among multiple designs. For example, with the standardized scale, the boundary values for the Pocock design are identical across all stages, and the O’Brien-Fleming design has boundary values (in absolute value) that decrease over the stages.
The remaining section demonstrates the transformations from one scale to the other scales. If the maximum likelihood estimate is computed by the analysis, then
where is the Fisher information if it does not depend on . Otherwise, is either the expected Fisher information evaluated at or the observed Fisher information. See the section Maximum Likelihood Estimator for a detailed description of these statistics.
With the MLE statistic , the corresponding standardized statistic is computed as
and the corresponding score statistic is computed as
Similarly, if a score statistic is computed by the analysis, then with
where is the information, either an expected Fisher information ( or ) or an observed Fisher information ( or ).
The corresponding standardized statistic is computed as
and the corresponding MLE-scaled statistic is computed as
With a standardized normal statistic, the corresponding fixed-sample nominal -value depends on the type of alternative hypothesis. With an upper alternative, the nominal -value is defined as the one-sided -value under the null hypothesis with an upper alternative:
With a lower alternative or a two-sided alternative, the nominal -value is defined as the one-sided -value under the null hypothesis with a lower alternative:
which is an increasing function of the standardized statistic (Emerson, Kittelson, and Gillen 2005, p. 12).
The BOUNDARYSCALE= MLE, STDZ, SCORE, and PVALUE options display the boundary values in the MLE, standardize , score, and -value scales, respectively. For example, suppose are observations of a response variable Y in a data set from a normal distribution with an unknown mean and a known variance . Then
for , where is the number of groups and is the number of observations at group .
If is the cumulative number of observations for the first groups, then the sample mean from these observations
has a normal distribution with mean and variance :
To test the null hypothesis , , where can be used. The MLE of is and
where the information is the inverse of the variance of ,
The corresponding standardized statistic is
The score statistic in the SEQDESIGN procedure is then given by
For a null hypothesis with an upper alternative, the nominal -value of the standardized statistic is . For a null hypothesis with a lower alternative or a two-sided alternative, the nominal -value of the standardized statistic is .
Copyright © SAS Institute, Inc. All Rights Reserved.