Economic Planning: How Should an Economy Grow


PROC OPTMODEL Statements and Output

The following PROC OPTMODEL statements declare index sets and parameters and then read the input data:

proc optmodel;
   num num_years = &num_years;
   set YEARS = 1..num_years;
   set YEARS0 = {0} union YEARS;

   set <str> INDUSTRIES;
   num init_stocks {INDUSTRIES};
   num init_productive_capacity {INDUSTRIES};
   num demand {INDUSTRIES};
   read data industry_data into INDUSTRIES=[industry]
      init_stocks init_productive_capacity demand;

   set <str> INPUTS;
   num production_coeff {INPUTS, INDUSTRIES};
   read data production_data into INPUTS=[input]
      {j in INDUSTRIES} <production_coeff[input,j]=col(j)>;

   num productive_capacity_coeff {INPUTS, INDUSTRIES};
   read data productive_capacity_data into INPUTS=[input]
      {j in INDUSTRIES} <productive_capacity_coeff[input,j]=col(j)>;

The following PROC OPTMODEL statements declare variables, a constant objective, and constraints for the static Leontief input-output model that is described on page 282 of Williams (1999):

   var StaticProduction {INDUSTRIES} >= 0;
   min Zero = 0;
   con Static_con {i in INDUSTRIES}:
      StaticProduction[i]
    = demand[i] + sum {j in INDUSTRIES} production_coeff[i,j] *
      StaticProduction[j];

The following SOLVE statement invokes the linear programming solver to solve this system of equations:

   solve;
   print StaticProduction;

Figure 9.1 shows the output from the linear programming solver for the static model.

Figure 9.1: Output from Linear Programming Solver for Static Leontief Input-Output Model

The OPTMODEL Procedure

Problem Summary
Objective Sense Minimization
Objective Function Zero
Objective Type Constant
   
Number of Variables 3
Bounded Above 0
Bounded Below 3
Bounded Below and Above 0
Free 0
Fixed 0
   
Number of Constraints 3
Linear LE (<=) 0
Linear EQ (=) 3
Linear GE (>=) 0
Linear Range 0
   
Constraint Coefficients 9

Performance Information
Execution Mode Single-Machine
Number of Threads 1

Solution Summary
Solver LP
Algorithm Dual Simplex
Objective Function Zero
Solution Status Optimal
Objective Value 0
   
Primal Infeasibility 2.131628E-14
Dual Infeasibility 0
Bound Infeasibility 0
   
Iterations 0
Presolve Time 0.00
Solution Time 0.00

[1] StaticProduction
coal 166.397
steel 105.668
transport 92.308



The following NUM and assignment statements declare the final_demand parameter and use the .sol variable suffix to populate final_demand with the solution from the static model:

   num final_demand {INDUSTRIES};
   for {i in INDUSTRIES} final_demand[i] = StaticProduction[i].sol;

The following statements declare variables, implicit variables, objectives, and constraints to be used in all three parts of the business problem:

   var Production {INDUSTRIES, 0..num_years+1} >= 0;
   var Stock {INDUSTRIES, 0..num_years+1} >= 0;
   var ExtraCapacity {INDUSTRIES, 1..num_years+2} >= 0;
   impvar ProductiveCapacity {i in INDUSTRIES, year in 1..num_years+1} =
      init_productive_capacity[i] + sum {y in 2..year} ExtraCapacity[i,y];
   for {i in INDUSTRIES} do;
      Production[i,0].ub = 0;
      Stock[i,0].lb = init_stocks[i];
      Stock[i,0].ub = init_stocks[i];
   end;

   max TotalProductiveCapacity =
      sum {i in INDUSTRIES} ProductiveCapacity[i,num_years];
   max TotalProduction =
      sum {i in INDUSTRIES, year in 4..5} Production[i,year];
   max TotalManpower =
      sum {i in INDUSTRIES, year in YEARS} (
         production_coeff['manpower',i] * Production[i,year+1]
       + productive_capacity_coeff['manpower',i] * ExtraCapacity[i,year+2]);

   con Continuity_con {i in INDUSTRIES, year in YEARS0}:
      Stock[i,year] + Production[i,year]
    = (if year in YEARS then demand[i] else 0)
    + sum {j in INDUSTRIES} (
         production_coeff[i,j] * Production[j,year+1]
       + productive_capacity_coeff[i,j] * ExtraCapacity[j,year+2])
    + Stock[i,year+1];

   con Manpower_con {year in 1..num_years+1}:
      sum {j in INDUSTRIES} (
         production_coeff['manpower',j] * Production[j,year]
       + productive_capacity_coeff['manpower',j] * ExtraCapacity[j,year+1])
    <= &manpower_capacity;

   con Capacity_con {i in INDUSTRIES, year in 1..num_years+1}:
      Production[i,year] <= ProductiveCapacity[i,year];

   for {i in INDUSTRIES}
      Production[i,num_years+1].lb = final_demand[i];

   for {i in INDUSTRIES, year in num_years+1..num_years+2}
      ExtraCapacity[i,year].ub = 0;

The following PROBLEM statement specifies the variables, objective, and constraints for Problem1:

   problem Problem1 include
      Production Stock ExtraCapacity
      TotalProductiveCapacity
      Continuity_con Manpower_con Capacity_con;

Because Problem1 and Problem2 have the same variables and constraints, the following PROBLEM statement uses the FROM option to copy these common parts from Problem1 and uses the INCLUDE option to specify only the new objective:

   problem Problem2 from Problem1 include
      TotalProduction;

The following PROBLEM statement specifies the variables, objective, and constraints for Problem3 (omitting the Manpower_con constraint):

   problem Problem3 include
      Production Stock ExtraCapacity
      TotalManpower
      Continuity_con Capacity_con;

Note that implicit variables are not included in the PROBLEM statements. Including them would yield an ERROR message.

The following USE PROBLEM statement switches the focus to the desired problem:

   use problem Problem1;
   solve;
   print Production Stock ExtraCapacity ProductiveCapacity Manpower_con.body;

Figure 9.2 shows the output from the linear programming solver for Problem1.

Figure 9.2: Output from Linear Programming Solver for Problem1

Problem Summary
Objective Sense Maximization
Objective Function TotalProductiveCapacity
Objective Type Linear
   
Number of Variables 63
Bounded Above 0
Bounded Below 51
Bounded Below and Above 0
Free 0
Fixed 12
   
Number of Constraints 42
Linear LE (<=) 24
Linear EQ (=) 18
Linear GE (>=) 0
Linear Range 0
   
Constraint Coefficients 255

Performance Information
Execution Mode Single-Machine
Number of Threads 1

Solution Summary
Solver LP
Algorithm Dual Simplex
Objective Function TotalProductiveCapacity
Solution Status Optimal
Objective Value 2141.8751967
   
Primal Infeasibility 2.167155E-13
Dual Infeasibility 0
Bound Infeasibility 7.105427E-15
   
Iterations 47
Presolve Time 0.00
Solution Time 0.02

[1] [2] Production Stock ExtraCapacity ProductiveCapacity
coal 0 0.000 150.0000    
coal 1 260.403 0.0000 0.0 300.0
coal 2 293.406 0.0000 0.0 300.0
coal 3 300.000 0.0000 0.0 300.0
coal 4 17.949 148.4480 189.2 489.2
coal 5 166.397 0.0000 1022.7 1511.9
coal 6 166.397 -0.0000 0.0 1511.9
coal 7     0.0  
steel 0 0.000 80.0000    
steel 1 135.342 12.2811 0.0 350.0
steel 2 181.660 0.0000 0.0 350.0
steel 3 193.090 0.0000 0.0 350.0
steel 4 105.668 0.0000 0.0 350.0
steel 5 105.668 0.0000 0.0 350.0
steel 6 105.668 -0.0000 0.0 350.0
steel 7     0.0  
transport 0 0.000 100.0000    
transport 1 140.722 6.2408 0.0 280.0
transport 2 200.580 0.0000 0.0 280.0
transport 3 267.152 0.0000 0.0 280.0
transport 4 92.308 0.0000 0.0 280.0
transport 5 92.308 0.0000 0.0 280.0
transport 6 92.308 0.0000 0.0 280.0
transport 7     0.0  

[1] Manpower_con.BODY
1 224.99
2 270.66
3 367.04
4 470.00
5 150.00
6 150.00



For Problem2, the right-hand side of each Continuity_con constraint changes to 0:

   use problem Problem2;
   for {i in INDUSTRIES, year in YEARS} do;
      Continuity_con[i,year].lb = 0;
      Continuity_con[i,year].ub = 0;
   end;
   solve;
   print Production Stock ExtraCapacity ProductiveCapacity Manpower_con.body;

Figure 9.3 shows the output from the linear programming solver for Problem2.

Figure 9.3: Output from Linear Programming Solver for Problem2

Problem Summary
Objective Sense Maximization
Objective Function TotalProduction
Objective Type Linear
   
Number of Variables 63
Bounded Above 0
Bounded Below 51
Bounded Below and Above 0
Free 0
Fixed 12
   
Number of Constraints 42
Linear LE (<=) 24
Linear EQ (=) 18
Linear GE (>=) 0
Linear Range 0
   
Constraint Coefficients 255

Performance Information
Execution Mode Single-Machine
Number of Threads 1

Solution Summary
Solver LP
Algorithm Dual Simplex
Objective Function TotalProduction
Solution Status Optimal
Objective Value 2618.5791147
   
Primal Infeasibility 4.547474E-13
Dual Infeasibility 0
Bound Infeasibility 0
   
Iterations 45
Presolve Time 0.00
Solution Time 0.00

[1] [2] Production Stock ExtraCapacity ProductiveCapacity
coal 0 0.000 150.000    
coal 1 300.000 20.110 0.0000 300.00
coal 2 315.323 131.554 15.3230 315.32
coal 3 430.505 0.000 115.1817 430.50
coal 4 430.505 0.000 0.0000 430.50
coal 5 430.505 0.000 0.0000 430.50
coal 6 166.397 324.108 0.0000 430.50
coal 7     0.0000  
steel 0 0.000 80.000    
steel 1 86.730 11.532 0.0000 350.00
steel 2 155.337 0.000 0.0000 350.00
steel 3 182.867 0.000 0.0000 350.00
steel 4 359.402 0.000 9.4023 359.40
steel 5 359.402 176.535 0.0000 359.40
steel 6 105.668 490.269 0.0000 359.40
steel 7     0.0000  
transport 0 0.000 100.000    
transport 1 141.312 0.000 0.0000 280.00
transport 2 198.388 0.000 0.0000 280.00
transport 3 225.918 0.000 0.0000 280.00
transport 4 519.383 0.000 239.3826 519.38
transport 5 519.383 293.465 0.0000 519.38
transport 6 92.308 750.540 0.0000 519.38
transport 7     0.0000  

[1] Manpower_con.BODY
1 240.41
2 321.55
3 384.17
4 470.00
5 470.00
6 150.00



For Problem3, the right-hand side of each Continuity_con[i,year] constraint changes back to demand[i]:

   use problem Problem3;
   for {i in INDUSTRIES, year in YEARS} do;
      Continuity_con[i,year].lb = demand[i];
      Continuity_con[i,year].ub = demand[i];
   end;
   solve;
   print Production Stock ExtraCapacity ProductiveCapacity Manpower_con.body;
quit;

Figure 9.4 shows the output from the linear programming solver for Problem3.

Figure 9.4: Output from Linear Programming Solver for Problem3

Problem Summary
Objective Sense Maximization
Objective Function TotalManpower
Objective Type Linear
   
Number of Variables 63
Bounded Above 0
Bounded Below 51
Bounded Below and Above 0
Free 0
Fixed 12
   
Number of Constraints 36
Linear LE (<=) 18
Linear EQ (=) 18
Linear GE (>=) 0
Linear Range 0
   
Constraint Coefficients 219

Performance Information
Execution Mode Single-Machine
Number of Threads 1

Solution Summary
Solver LP
Algorithm Dual Simplex
Objective Function TotalManpower
Solution Status Optimal
Objective Value 2450.0266228
   
Primal Infeasibility 1.98952E-13
Dual Infeasibility 0
Bound Infeasibility 0
   
Iterations 50
Presolve Time 0.00
Solution Time 0.00

[1] [2] Production Stock ExtraCapacity ProductiveCapacity
coal 0 0.00 150.0000    
coal 1 251.79 0.0000 0.0000 300.00
coal 2 316.02 0.0000 16.0152 316.02
coal 3 319.83 0.0000 3.8168 319.83
coal 4 366.35 0.0000 46.5177 366.35
coal 5 859.36 0.0000 493.0099 859.36
coal 6 859.36 460.2080 0.0000 859.36
coal 7     0.0000  
steel 0 0.00 80.0000    
steel 1 134.79 11.0280 0.0000 350.00
steel 2 175.04 0.0000 0.0000 350.00
steel 3 224.06 0.0000 0.0000 350.00
steel 4 223.14 0.0000 0.0000 350.00
steel 5 220.04 0.0000 0.0000 350.00
steel 6 350.00 0.0000 0.0000 350.00
steel 7     0.0000  
transport 0 0.00 100.0000    
transport 1 143.56 4.2472 0.0000 280.00
transport 2 181.68 0.0000 0.0000 280.00
transport 3 280.00 0.0000 0.0000 280.00
transport 4 279.07 0.0000 0.0000 280.00
transport 5 275.98 0.0000 0.0000 280.00
transport 6 195.54 0.0000 0.0000 280.00
transport 7     0.0000  

[1] Manpower_con.BODY
1 226.63
2 279.98
3 333.73
4 539.77
5 636.82
6 659.72