Problem Statement

A company has two factories, one at Liverpool and one at Brighton.[20] In addition it has four depots with storage facilities at Newcastle, Birmingham, London and Exeter. The company sells its product to six customers C1, C2, …, C6. Customers can be supplied either from a depot or from the factory direct (see Figure 19.1).

Figure 19.1:  


Table 19.1:  

 

Supplier[a]

 

Liverpool

Brighton

Newcastle

Birmingham

London

Exeter

Supplied to

factory

factory

depot

depot

depot

depot

Depots

Newcastle

0.5

Birmingham

0.5

0.3

London

1.0

0.5

Exeter

0.2

0.2

Customers

C1

1.0

2.0

1.0

C2

1.5

0.5

1.5

C3

1.5

0.5

0.5

2.0

0.2

C4

2.0

1.5

1.0

1.5

C5

0.5

0.5

0.5

C6

1.0

1.0

1.5

1.5

[a] A dash indicates the impossibility of certain suppliers for certain depots or customers.


The distribution costs (which are borne by the company) are known; they are given in Table 19.1 (in £ per ton delivered).

Certain customers have expressed preferences for being supplied from factories or depots which they are used to. The preferred suppliers are

C1

Liverpool (factory)

C2

Newcastle (depot)

C3

No preferences

C4

No preferences

C5

Birmingham (depot)

C6

Exeter or London (depots)

Each factory has a monthly capacity given below which cannot be exceeded:

Liverpool

150,000 tons

Brighton

200,000 tons

Each depot has a maximum monthly throughput given below which cannot be exceeded:

Newcastle

70,000 tons

Birmingham

50,000 tons

London

100,000 tons

Exeter

40,000 tons

Each customer has a monthly requirement given below which must be met:

C1

50,000 tons

C2

10,000 tons

C3

40,000 tons

C4

35,000 tons

C5

60,000 tons

C6

20,000 tons

The company would like to determine:

  1. What distribution pattern would minimize overall cost?

  2. What the effect of increasing factory and depot capacities would be on distribution costs?

  3. What the effects of small changes in costs, capacities and requirements would be on the distribution pattern?

  4. Would it be possible to meet all customers preferences regarding suppliers and if so what would the extra cost of doing this be?



[20] Reproduced with permission of John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (Williams 1999, pp. 249–251).