The UCM Procedure |
Computational Issues |
As explained in the section Parameter Estimation, the model parameters are estimated by nonlinear optimization of the likelihood. This process is not guaranteed to succeed. For some data sets, the optimization algorithm can fail to converge. Nonconvergence can result from a number of causes, including flat or ridged likelihood surfaces and ill-conditioned data. It is also possible for the algorithm to converge to a point that is not the global optimum of the likelihood.
If you experience convergence problems, the following points might be helpful:
Data that are extremely large or extremely small can adversely affect results because of the internal tolerances used during the filtering steps of the likelihood calculation. Rescaling the data can improve stability.
Examine your model for redundancies in the included components and regressors. If some of the included components or regressors are nearly collinear to each other, then the optimization process can become unstable.
Experimenting with different options offered by the NLOPTIONS statement can help.
Lack of convergence can indicate model misspecification or a violation of the normality assumption.
The computing resources required for the UCM procedure depend on several factors. The memory requirement for the procedure is largely dependent on the number of observations to be processed and the size of the state vector underlying the specified model. If denotes the sample size and denotes the size of the state vector, the memory requirement for the smoothing stage of the Kalman filter is of the order of bytes, ignoring the lower-order terms. If the smoothed component estimates are not needed then the memory requirement is of the order of bytes. Besides and , the computing time for the parameter estimation depends on the type of components included in the model. For example, the parameter estimation is usually faster if the model parameter vector consists only of disturbance variances, because in this case there is an efficient way to compute the likelihood gradient.
Copyright © 2008 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. All rights reserved.